<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 667 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258786</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) was unjustified in invoking Section 263 as the Assessing Officer (A.O) had already addressed the issues during assessment. The CIT&#039;s order canceling the assessment under Section 143(3) was set aside, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The additional ground raised by the Assessee was deemed academic and not decided. The order was pronounced in Open Court on 20-03-2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 21:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 667 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258786</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) was unjustified in invoking Section 263 as the Assessing Officer (A.O) had already addressed the issues during assessment. The CIT&#039;s order canceling the assessment under Section 143(3) was set aside, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The additional ground raised by the Assessee was deemed academic and not decided. The order was pronounced in Open Court on 20-03-2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>