https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169438 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of a Civil Engineer who challenged his suspension and demotion by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir. The Court held that the engineer failed to demonstrate a violation of fundamental rights under Art. 14 and clarified that the High Court lacked jurisdiction under Art. 32(2A) of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that Arts. 226 and 311(2) were not applicable in Jammu and Kashmir at the relevant time. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed without costs, focusing on procedural aspects and legal frameworks governing the engineer's case. en-us Thu, 23 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:42:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169438 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of a Civil Engineer who challenged his suspension and demotion by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir. The Court held that the engineer failed to demonstrate a violation of fundamental rights under Art. 14 and clarified that the High Court lacked jurisdiction under Art. 32(2A) of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that Arts. 226 and 311(2) were not applicable in Jammu and Kashmir at the relevant time. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed without costs, focusing on procedural aspects and legal frameworks governing the engineer's case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169438