<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (5) TMI 44 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169437</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the decisions of the lower courts. The Court held that the appellant&#039;s application to appear as a witness under s. 342A was valid and should have been permitted. The ruling clarified the applicability of the amended Code to pending prosecutions, affirming the right of the accused to give evidence in disproof of the charges against them, as provided by the Amending Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:11:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (5) TMI 44 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169437</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the decisions of the lower courts. The Court held that the appellant&#039;s application to appear as a witness under s. 342A was valid and should have been permitted. The ruling clarified the applicability of the amended Code to pending prosecutions, affirming the right of the accused to give evidence in disproof of the charges against them, as provided by the Amending Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>