<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (11) TMI 31 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169436</link>
    <description>The court held that orders of the Collector of Customs and Central Excise are quasi-judicial and subject to certiorari. It rejected the doctrine of merger when orders are confirmed by authorities outside the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction. Violation of natural justice renders orders null, and the court clarified the validity of penalties under the Sea Customs Act. Judgments varied: one appeal was dismissed due to lack of notice, while others were allowed based on the doctrine of merger or non-compliance with procedural requirements. The court emphasized natural justice principles and the limited jurisdiction of the High Court in issuing writs against orders confirmed by external authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (11) TMI 31 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169436</link>
      <description>The court held that orders of the Collector of Customs and Central Excise are quasi-judicial and subject to certiorari. It rejected the doctrine of merger when orders are confirmed by authorities outside the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction. Violation of natural justice renders orders null, and the court clarified the validity of penalties under the Sea Customs Act. Judgments varied: one appeal was dismissed due to lack of notice, while others were allowed based on the doctrine of merger or non-compliance with procedural requirements. The court emphasized natural justice principles and the limited jurisdiction of the High Court in issuing writs against orders confirmed by external authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>