https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169433 The Supreme Court rejected the contention regarding the alteration of conviction from Section 165A to Section 161/109 I.P.C., finding no prejudice against the appellant. Regarding the admissibility of Exs. P-3 and P-4 as confessions, the Court determined they did not meet the criteria for a confession and did not prove the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence, and acquitted the appellant. en-us Tue, 15 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:35:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169433 The Supreme Court rejected the contention regarding the alteration of conviction from Section 165A to Section 161/109 I.P.C., finding no prejudice against the appellant. Regarding the admissibility of Exs. P-3 and P-4 as confessions, the Court determined they did not meet the criteria for a confession and did not prove the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence, and acquitted the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169433