https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169429 The Supreme Court dismissed both appeals, ruling that an appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution against the Conciliation Officer's direction is not competent, and an appeal to the Labour Appellate Tribunal under the Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950, is not maintainable. The Court clarified that the Conciliation Officer does not possess judicial power and his role is limited to removing a statutory ban on altering workmen's terms of employment, without delivering determinative judgments affecting parties' rights. en-us Tue, 25 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jun 2015 16:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169429 The Supreme Court dismissed both appeals, ruling that an appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution against the Conciliation Officer's direction is not competent, and an appeal to the Labour Appellate Tribunal under the Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950, is not maintainable. The Court clarified that the Conciliation Officer does not possess judicial power and his role is limited to removing a statutory ban on altering workmen's terms of employment, without delivering determinative judgments affecting parties' rights. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169429