<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 159 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169428</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, except for the restriction on the transfer of property within the ceiling area imposed by Section 27(1). The definition of &#039;family&#039; in Section 2(f) and the provisions of Sections 23 and 11(6) were found to be valid and not in violation of the Constitution. The writ petitions were dismissed except for the partial invalidation of Section 27(1), and there was no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 159 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169428</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, except for the restriction on the transfer of property within the ceiling area imposed by Section 27(1). The definition of &#039;family&#039; in Section 2(f) and the provisions of Sections 23 and 11(6) were found to be valid and not in violation of the Constitution. The writ petitions were dismissed except for the partial invalidation of Section 27(1), and there was no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>