https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258770 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the demand for CENVAT credit on capital goods, inputs, and services used in the installation of destroyed goods. Relying on legal precedent, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit for the destroyed goods as they were used in manufacturing final products. The decision provided consequential relief to the appellant based on factual findings and established legal principles, aligning with the settled legal proposition from the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:27:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258770 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the demand for CENVAT credit on capital goods, inputs, and services used in the installation of destroyed goods. Relying on legal precedent, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit for the destroyed goods as they were used in manufacturing final products. The decision provided consequential relief to the appellant based on factual findings and established legal principles, aligning with the settled legal proposition from the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258770