<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 647 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant concerning the determination of applicable duty rates on Cigarettes between 17.03.2012 to 27.05.2012. The Tribunal found that the duty should be charged based on the rates announced on 16.03.2012, as the amendment to the Finance Bill 2012 on 08.05.2012 was not accompanied by a declaration under the PCT Act. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 647 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant concerning the determination of applicable duty rates on Cigarettes between 17.03.2012 to 27.05.2012. The Tribunal found that the duty should be charged based on the rates announced on 16.03.2012, as the amendment to the Finance Bill 2012 on 08.05.2012 was not accompanied by a declaration under the PCT Act. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>