<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 640 - COMPANY LAW BOARD MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258759</link>
    <description>Article notes on refusal of registration of share transfer under the Companies Act, 1956: limitation for a petition under Section 111A was treated as governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, with time running from the date of refusal, so the petition was within time. The dispute was found not to involve any complicated question of title requiring a civil suit and was suitable for summary determination. The company&#039;s objections based on an alleged scheme restriction, lack of authority, RBI guidelines, and stamp duty were rejected as unsustainable, and the refusal to register the transfer was held unjustified, with rectification of the register directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 640 - COMPANY LAW BOARD MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258759</link>
      <description>Article notes on refusal of registration of share transfer under the Companies Act, 1956: limitation for a petition under Section 111A was treated as governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, with time running from the date of refusal, so the petition was within time. The dispute was found not to involve any complicated question of title requiring a civil suit and was suitable for summary determination. The company&#039;s objections based on an alleged scheme restriction, lack of authority, RBI guidelines, and stamp duty were rejected as unsustainable, and the refusal to register the transfer was held unjustified, with rectification of the register directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>