https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169422 The inherent power of the High Court remains available even where revisional jurisdiction may also lie, and it should not be defeated by a purely technical objection such as the absence of a certified copy when the impugned order is already on record. That power may still be used sparingly to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. In obscenity prosecutions, a censor certificate under cinematograph law is relevant and weighty evidence, but it is not conclusive and does not bind the criminal court, which must independently determine whether the penal ingredients are established. en-us Fri, 26 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169422 The inherent power of the High Court remains available even where revisional jurisdiction may also lie, and it should not be defeated by a purely technical objection such as the absence of a certified copy when the impugned order is already on record. That power may still be used sparingly to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. In obscenity prosecutions, a censor certificate under cinematograph law is relevant and weighty evidence, but it is not conclusive and does not bind the criminal court, which must independently determine whether the penal ingredients are established. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169422