https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169420 Preventive detention under the National Security Act was upheld where the detaining authority relied on relevant, proximate and germane material showing a live nexus with the statutory object, and the order was not shown to be a colourable exercise of power. The Explanation to section 3(1) of the Prevention of Black-marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act did not exclude detention under section 3(2) of the National Security Act because the two enactments operated in different fields. Compliance with Article 22(5) and the Act's procedural safeguards was also found intact, as the grounds were supplied, representation was considered, and the Advisory Board process was followed. en-us Thu, 25 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:15:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169420 Preventive detention under the National Security Act was upheld where the detaining authority relied on relevant, proximate and germane material showing a live nexus with the statutory object, and the order was not shown to be a colourable exercise of power. The Explanation to section 3(1) of the Prevention of Black-marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act did not exclude detention under section 3(2) of the National Security Act because the two enactments operated in different fields. Compliance with Article 22(5) and the Act's procedural safeguards was also found intact, as the grounds were supplied, representation was considered, and the Advisory Board process was followed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169420