<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Argument on Hydro Power Project Contract as Non-Composite Strengthens Position on Service Tax in Construction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22575</link>
    <description>Construction Services - It is difficult to imagine a hydro power project without a dam. Once again, this is also arguable and prima facie view is in favour of appellant since appellant is not treating the contract as a composite contract. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 22:18:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 22:18:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Argument on Hydro Power Project Contract as Non-Composite Strengthens Position on Service Tax in Construction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22575</link>
      <description>Construction Services - It is difficult to imagine a hydro power project without a dam. Once again, this is also arguable and prima facie view is in favour of appellant since appellant is not treating the contract as a composite contract. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 22:18:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>