<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (2) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169399</link>
    <description>In preventive detention, the absence of an affidavit from the detaining authority is not fatal where no specific plea of personal bias, mala fides, or other extraneous consideration is raised; an affidavit from another responsible officer based on official records is sufficient, so the detention was not invalidated on that ground. Non-disclosure of an additional descriptive allegation did not vitiate detention where the grounds supplied to the detenu set out the complete factual basis, including the incidents relied upon, and thus enabled an effective representation; the detention was therefore upheld and the writ petition rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:58:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (2) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169399</link>
      <description>In preventive detention, the absence of an affidavit from the detaining authority is not fatal where no specific plea of personal bias, mala fides, or other extraneous consideration is raised; an affidavit from another responsible officer based on official records is sufficient, so the detention was not invalidated on that ground. Non-disclosure of an additional descriptive allegation did not vitiate detention where the grounds supplied to the detenu set out the complete factual basis, including the incidents relied upon, and thus enabled an effective representation; the detention was therefore upheld and the writ petition rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>