https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169398 The power to continue detention under Rule 30A(9) was held to depend on an objective assessment of existing facts and circumstances, not mere subjective satisfaction. Because that review affects personal liberty and requires consideration of relevant material, the authority acts quasi-judicially and must observe natural justice. The detenue was entitled to a fair opportunity to meet or contradict the adverse material relied on, unless privilege was lawfully claimed in an appropriate case. As no such opportunity was given, the continuation order was invalid and could not stand. en-us Tue, 07 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:40:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169398 The power to continue detention under Rule 30A(9) was held to depend on an objective assessment of existing facts and circumstances, not mere subjective satisfaction. Because that review affects personal liberty and requires consideration of relevant material, the authority acts quasi-judicially and must observe natural justice. The detenue was entitled to a fair opportunity to meet or contradict the adverse material relied on, unless privilege was lawfully claimed in an appropriate case. As no such opportunity was given, the continuation order was invalid and could not stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169398