https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169395 In preventive detention matters, the detenu must receive the basic facts forming the grounds of detention in a clear and intelligible form, but not every subsidiary or evidentiary detail. On the facts stated, the detention order and grounds were held to have been duly communicated through the official record and jail authorities, and the later affidavit cured any earlier lack of clarity. The grounds were also found not to be vague because they conveyed the pith and substance of the allegations and enabled an effective representation, while omitted particulars such as dates and other details were treated as non-essential or justifiably withheld in public interest. The detention order was upheld. en-us Thu, 10 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2019 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169395 In preventive detention matters, the detenu must receive the basic facts forming the grounds of detention in a clear and intelligible form, but not every subsidiary or evidentiary detail. On the facts stated, the detention order and grounds were held to have been duly communicated through the official record and jail authorities, and the later affidavit cured any earlier lack of clarity. The grounds were also found not to be vague because they conveyed the pith and substance of the allegations and enabled an effective representation, while omitted particulars such as dates and other details were treated as non-essential or justifiably withheld in public interest. The detention order was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169395