https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169391 The Court found in favor of the detenu in a habeas corpus petition, highlighting the unreasonable delay of 22 days in considering the detenu's representation as a violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The detenu's right to prompt consideration was upheld, leading to the quashing of the detention order and immediate release. The Court emphasized the importance of timely review of representations in cases of preventive detention to safeguard individual liberties. en-us Wed, 03 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2015 10:04:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169391 The Court found in favor of the detenu in a habeas corpus petition, highlighting the unreasonable delay of 22 days in considering the detenu's representation as a violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The detenu's right to prompt consideration was upheld, leading to the quashing of the detention order and immediate release. The Court emphasized the importance of timely review of representations in cases of preventive detention to safeguard individual liberties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169391