https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258737 The court confirmed the duty on zinc dross and ash for a specific period, as the goods were deemed marketable post-amendment to the Central Excise Act. The appellant did not dispute the duty but contested the penalty imposition, arguing no suppression as all clearances were disclosed in returns. Relying on a precedent, the Tribunal set aside the penalty while upholding the duty and interest. The appellant was not required to pre-deposit the penalty as the duty had already been paid. The case was concluded with the dismissal of the stay petition and appeal. en-us Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2015 07:02:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258737 The court confirmed the duty on zinc dross and ash for a specific period, as the goods were deemed marketable post-amendment to the Central Excise Act. The appellant did not dispute the duty but contested the penalty imposition, arguing no suppression as all clearances were disclosed in returns. Relying on a precedent, the Tribunal set aside the penalty while upholding the duty and interest. The appellant was not required to pre-deposit the penalty as the duty had already been paid. The case was concluded with the dismissal of the stay petition and appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258737