<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 611 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258729</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of the U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the Molasses Policy 2011-12. The reservation of 22% of molasses for distilleries manufacturing country-made liquor and the maintenance of a ratio of 1:3.5 between reserved and unreserved molasses were deemed legal and necessary measures. The court found the policy to be reasonable, providing for flexibility and relaxation in case of hardships. The petitioner&#039;s claims of financial hardships were not substantiated, and the State Government&#039;s power to relax the policy was acknowledged and exercised in the petitioner&#039;s case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 20:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 611 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258729</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of the U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the Molasses Policy 2011-12. The reservation of 22% of molasses for distilleries manufacturing country-made liquor and the maintenance of a ratio of 1:3.5 between reserved and unreserved molasses were deemed legal and necessary measures. The court found the policy to be reasonable, providing for flexibility and relaxation in case of hardships. The petitioner&#039;s claims of financial hardships were not substantiated, and the State Government&#039;s power to relax the policy was acknowledged and exercised in the petitioner&#039;s case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>