https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258728 The Court set aside the orders proposing to reverse Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to discrepancies in purchases, emphasizing that as long as the purchasing dealer complies with requirements, the claim cannot be denied. The burden is on the tax department to take action against vendors who do not remit taxes. The Court directed a reconsideration of the petitioner's case on merits, instructing the submission of necessary documents attested by the seller. Failure to comply would empower the authority to pass independent orders. The writ petitions were disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2015 20:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258728 The Court set aside the orders proposing to reverse Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to discrepancies in purchases, emphasizing that as long as the purchasing dealer complies with requirements, the claim cannot be denied. The burden is on the tax department to take action against vendors who do not remit taxes. The Court directed a reconsideration of the petitioner's case on merits, instructing the submission of necessary documents attested by the seller. Failure to comply would empower the authority to pass independent orders. The writ petitions were disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258728