https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258720 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal. The appellant was entitled to claim remission of duty on finished goods lost in a fire incident based on a previous ruling. They were not required to pay duty on the lost finished goods and were not obligated to reverse the Cenvat Credit on inputs in semi-finished goods, unfinished goods, and capital goods lost in the fire. The case outcome favored the appellant, absolving them from the liability to pay duty on the goods lost in the fire. en-us Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258720 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal. The appellant was entitled to claim remission of duty on finished goods lost in a fire incident based on a previous ruling. They were not required to pay duty on the lost finished goods and were not obligated to reverse the Cenvat Credit on inputs in semi-finished goods, unfinished goods, and capital goods lost in the fire. The case outcome favored the appellant, absolving them from the liability to pay duty on the goods lost in the fire. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258720