<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 591 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258709</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment reopening as the Assessing Officer had tangible material indicating income had escaped assessment. However, the Tribunal remanded the case for further examination of the accounting policy change regarding depreciation, directing the AO to verify relevant records. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 06:28:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 591 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258709</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment reopening as the Assessing Officer had tangible material indicating income had escaped assessment. However, the Tribunal remanded the case for further examination of the accounting policy change regarding depreciation, directing the AO to verify relevant records. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>