<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 585 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258703</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition for the understatement of copper stock for A.Y. 2007-08 due to lack of credible evidence from the assessee. Regarding the disallowance of interest under section 40A(2)(a) for A.Y. 2007-08 and 2008-09, the Tribunal granted partial relief by allowing a premium of 25% over the bank rate for calculating the excess interest rate. The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 585 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258703</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition for the understatement of copper stock for A.Y. 2007-08 due to lack of credible evidence from the assessee. Regarding the disallowance of interest under section 40A(2)(a) for A.Y. 2007-08 and 2008-09, the Tribunal granted partial relief by allowing a premium of 25% over the bank rate for calculating the excess interest rate. The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>