<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 582 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258700</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding discrepancies in sales figures and the purchase of oil. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate reporting and matching figures in different documents for tax assessments. The discrepancies in sales figures were resolved based on certificates from the Commercial Tax Officer, while the difference in the purchase of oil was attributed to reporting non-taxable purchases as taxable in the P&amp;amp;L account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 582 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258700</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding discrepancies in sales figures and the purchase of oil. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate reporting and matching figures in different documents for tax assessments. The discrepancies in sales figures were resolved based on certificates from the Commercial Tax Officer, while the difference in the purchase of oil was attributed to reporting non-taxable purchases as taxable in the P&amp;amp;L account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>