<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (5) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169375</link>
    <description>A pronote debt was treated as property that had to be disclosed in Encumbered Estates Act proceedings, and its concealment could support conviction for dishonest concealment of property. The officer&#039;s communication was capable of founding cognizance because it set out facts constituting an offence and could be treated as a complaint or as information under the Criminal Procedure Code. The Court also recognised power to recall witnesses before judgment where their evidence was needed for a just decision, provided the accused had an opportunity to meet the material. The conviction and sentence were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (5) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169375</link>
      <description>A pronote debt was treated as property that had to be disclosed in Encumbered Estates Act proceedings, and its concealment could support conviction for dishonest concealment of property. The officer&#039;s communication was capable of founding cognizance because it set out facts constituting an offence and could be treated as a complaint or as information under the Criminal Procedure Code. The Court also recognised power to recall witnesses before judgment where their evidence was needed for a just decision, provided the accused had an opportunity to meet the material. The conviction and sentence were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>