https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169374 Recorded evidence may be corrected to remove obvious typographical errors or secure accuracy while the witness is present, but an unsigned correction slip cannot compel substantive alteration of testimony or permit a witness to depart from the earlier version. The trial court was therefore justified in refusing to rewrite the substantive evidence. After prosecution evidence has closed and the accused has been examined under Section 313, liberty to recall a witness is unwarranted without proper application or demonstrated necessity, and the entire Section 313 examination should not be expunged merely because further evidence may later arise; any new incriminating material should be put only to the extent required. The case was directed to proceed expeditiously before the successor judge. en-us Tue, 08 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:47:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169374 Recorded evidence may be corrected to remove obvious typographical errors or secure accuracy while the witness is present, but an unsigned correction slip cannot compel substantive alteration of testimony or permit a witness to depart from the earlier version. The trial court was therefore justified in refusing to rewrite the substantive evidence. After prosecution evidence has closed and the accused has been examined under Section 313, liberty to recall a witness is unwarranted without proper application or demonstrated necessity, and the entire Section 313 examination should not be expunged merely because further evidence may later arise; any new incriminating material should be put only to the extent required. The case was directed to proceed expeditiously before the successor judge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169374