<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (9) TMI 62 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169371</link>
    <description>Section 540 of the Code of Criminal Procedure applies to commitment proceedings under section 207A, because the special commitment procedure does not displace the court&#039;s independent power to summon or recall witnesses when their evidence appears essential to a just decision. Although the accused has no right to lead defence evidence before commitment under section 207A, that limitation does not bar resort to section 540. The Magistrate&#039;s refusal was treated as an exercise of discretion on the merits, not as a jurisdictional rejection under section 540, and the High Court was not justified in interfering on the footing that section 540 was unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:01:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (9) TMI 62 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169371</link>
      <description>Section 540 of the Code of Criminal Procedure applies to commitment proceedings under section 207A, because the special commitment procedure does not displace the court&#039;s independent power to summon or recall witnesses when their evidence appears essential to a just decision. Although the accused has no right to lead defence evidence before commitment under section 207A, that limitation does not bar resort to section 540. The Magistrate&#039;s refusal was treated as an exercise of discretion on the merits, not as a jurisdictional rejection under section 540, and the High Court was not justified in interfering on the footing that section 540 was unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>