<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 577 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dropping the service tax demands on &#039;Freight Rebate&#039;, &#039;Primary Freight Reimbursement&#039;, and &#039;Handling/Facility Charges&#039;. The penalties imposed on the assessee under sections 75A, 76, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were impliedly set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 577 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dropping the service tax demands on &#039;Freight Rebate&#039;, &#039;Primary Freight Reimbursement&#039;, and &#039;Handling/Facility Charges&#039;. The penalties imposed on the assessee under sections 75A, 76, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were impliedly set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>