https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169366 Section 6(2) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act was upheld as valid because the statute disclosed a clear policy of fixing maximum rent, regulating reasonable rent and protecting tenants, leaving only an ancillary power to set a lower ceiling for specified areas. The notification issued under that provision was also upheld, since it was an exercise of valid statutory power and not fresh legislation offending Article 31. The power under section 6(2) was further held not to be exhausted by one notification and could be exercised again from time to time under the general principles governing delegated legislation. en-us Thu, 25 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:36:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169366 Section 6(2) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act was upheld as valid because the statute disclosed a clear policy of fixing maximum rent, regulating reasonable rent and protecting tenants, leaving only an ancillary power to set a lower ceiling for specified areas. The notification issued under that provision was also upheld, since it was an exercise of valid statutory power and not fresh legislation offending Article 31. The power under section 6(2) was further held not to be exhausted by one notification and could be exercised again from time to time under the general principles governing delegated legislation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169366