<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 353 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169365</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision to quash a promotion order and direct the promotion of an appellant to the post of Dy. Operations Manager. The promotion was deemed illegal due to flaws in the selection process, including improper evaluation criteria based on ACRs and interviews. The Court found the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by altering selection criteria and emphasized the importance of professional ability and management capacity in evaluations for higher positions. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s order, and dismissed the writ petition without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:59:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 353 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169365</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision to quash a promotion order and direct the promotion of an appellant to the post of Dy. Operations Manager. The promotion was deemed illegal due to flaws in the selection process, including improper evaluation criteria based on ACRs and interviews. The Court found the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by altering selection criteria and emphasized the importance of professional ability and management capacity in evaluations for higher positions. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s order, and dismissed the writ petition without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>