<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 243 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169364</link>
    <description>A selection by a constitutionally appointed Public Service Commission cannot be invalidated through collateral allegations about the integrity, calibre or political or caste connections of its members when the appointments themselves are not directly challenged and there is no supporting evidence. The rule against bias requires a member to abstain from interviewing or discussing a relative-candidate, but not to the entire selection process; where the member fully withdraws for that candidate and does not participate in deliberation, bias is not established. In composite recruitment, calling an excessively large number of candidates and giving disproportionate weight to viva voce can create arbitrariness, so interview marks and interview size must remain within reasonable limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:48:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 243 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169364</link>
      <description>A selection by a constitutionally appointed Public Service Commission cannot be invalidated through collateral allegations about the integrity, calibre or political or caste connections of its members when the appointments themselves are not directly challenged and there is no supporting evidence. The rule against bias requires a member to abstain from interviewing or discussing a relative-candidate, but not to the entire selection process; where the member fully withdraws for that candidate and does not participate in deliberation, bias is not established. In composite recruitment, calling an excessively large number of candidates and giving disproportionate weight to viva voce can create arbitrariness, so interview marks and interview size must remain within reasonable limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>