<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 258 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169358</link>
    <description>Custody under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not limited to formal arrest or remand; it also includes surrender before the court and submission to its jurisdiction, so the Sessions Court had jurisdiction to consider bail once the accused appeared and surrendered. The Supreme Court further held that a reasoned bail order, affirmed by the High Court, should not be lightly interfered with under Article 136 where discretion has been exercised on the material before the lower courts, especially in a case involving rival versions. The challenge to the bail order therefore failed and the accused remained on bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 258 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169358</link>
      <description>Custody under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not limited to formal arrest or remand; it also includes surrender before the court and submission to its jurisdiction, so the Sessions Court had jurisdiction to consider bail once the accused appeared and surrendered. The Supreme Court further held that a reasoned bail order, affirmed by the High Court, should not be lightly interfered with under Article 136 where discretion has been exercised on the material before the lower courts, especially in a case involving rival versions. The challenge to the bail order therefore failed and the accused remained on bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>