https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169350 A remand under Section 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 was stated to be valid even without the accused being personally produced before the Magistrate, because personal production is desirable but not an absolute statutory when the court acts within the remand framework. Section 344(1A) and its Explanation were described as supplying adequate guidance through written reasons, limited remand periods and a defined standard of reasonable cause, including where further evidence may likely be obtained. The provision was treated as applicable at the investigation stage, and the challenge to its validity and scope was rejected. en-us Tue, 24 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:00:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169350 A remand under Section 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 was stated to be valid even without the accused being personally produced before the Magistrate, because personal production is desirable but not an absolute statutory when the court acts within the remand framework. Section 344(1A) and its Explanation were described as supplying adequate guidance through written reasons, limited remand periods and a defined standard of reasonable cause, including where further evidence may likely be obtained. The provision was treated as applicable at the investigation stage, and the challenge to its validity and scope was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169350