<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (10) TMI 72 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169347</link>
    <description>Administrative refusal to extend time for sale of released sugar was found unreasonable because the release orders contemplated disposal within a short period, but the governing policy allowed a reasonable time for open-market sale. The appellants had taken prompt steps to complete sales and secure railway wagons, and the shortfall arose from circumstances beyond their control. Since a restriction on the freedom to trade must be reasonable, the action taken under the control order was judged on that standard. The refusal to grant further time was therefore held to be mechanical and unjustified, and the matter was decided in favour of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (10) TMI 72 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169347</link>
      <description>Administrative refusal to extend time for sale of released sugar was found unreasonable because the release orders contemplated disposal within a short period, but the governing policy allowed a reasonable time for open-market sale. The appellants had taken prompt steps to complete sales and secure railway wagons, and the shortfall arose from circumstances beyond their control. Since a restriction on the freedom to trade must be reasonable, the action taken under the control order was judged on that standard. The refusal to grant further time was therefore held to be mechanical and unjustified, and the matter was decided in favour of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>