<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 269 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169342</link>
    <description>The delayed supply of crucial documents to the detenu violated the constitutional safeguard under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. As the detaining authority failed to provide all relied upon documents simultaneously with the grounds of detention, the continued order of detention was deemed void. The detenu, who was arrested for smuggling silver, was released immediately as the Court held that the delayed supply hindered the detenu&#039;s ability to make an effective representation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 269 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169342</link>
      <description>The delayed supply of crucial documents to the detenu violated the constitutional safeguard under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. As the detaining authority failed to provide all relied upon documents simultaneously with the grounds of detention, the continued order of detention was deemed void. The detenu, who was arrested for smuggling silver, was released immediately as the Court held that the delayed supply hindered the detenu&#039;s ability to make an effective representation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>