<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (12) TMI 69 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169339</link>
    <description>Preventive detention may be sustained where the relied-on incident, though not recent, remains sufficiently connected to a reasonable prognosis of future prejudicial conduct; a grave organised dacoity was treated as not too remote. The act was also held to affect public order, because armed violence causing panic, injuries and deaths had wider community repercussions beyond a mere law-and-order breach. Non-disclosure of additional history-sheet material did not vitiate the order, as no extra prejudicial material was shown to have been relied upon. Delay in reporting the detention order was excused because the report was sent with reasonable despatch and without avoidable delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:24:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (12) TMI 69 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169339</link>
      <description>Preventive detention may be sustained where the relied-on incident, though not recent, remains sufficiently connected to a reasonable prognosis of future prejudicial conduct; a grave organised dacoity was treated as not too remote. The act was also held to affect public order, because armed violence causing panic, injuries and deaths had wider community repercussions beyond a mere law-and-order breach. Non-disclosure of additional history-sheet material did not vitiate the order, as no extra prejudicial material was shown to have been relied upon. Delay in reporting the detention order was excused because the report was sent with reasonable despatch and without avoidable delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>