<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 531 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258649</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; findings that the services provided by the respondent fell under the category of &#039;Survey and Map Making Service&#039; for the period 1999-2000 to 2003-2004. The dispute centered on whether the activities constituted &#039;Consulting Engineering Service&#039; as argued by the Revenue or &#039;Survey and Map Making Service&#039; as determined by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal concluded that the services aligned more closely with &#039;Survey and Map Making Service&#039; based on the nature of the work performed, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the classification as per the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 531 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258649</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; findings that the services provided by the respondent fell under the category of &#039;Survey and Map Making Service&#039; for the period 1999-2000 to 2003-2004. The dispute centered on whether the activities constituted &#039;Consulting Engineering Service&#039; as argued by the Revenue or &#039;Survey and Map Making Service&#039; as determined by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal concluded that the services aligned more closely with &#039;Survey and Map Making Service&#039; based on the nature of the work performed, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the classification as per the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>