<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 525 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258643</link>
    <description>For the period before 23.07.1996, steel items such as angles, channels, joists, plates and tubes used as machinery parts or as structures integrally connected with plant were treated as eligible for Modvat credit under the wider capital goods concept, so the credit denial for that period was set aside. For January 1997 to March 1997, eligibility under the amended capital goods definition depended on the actual use of the steel items in fabrication of machinery or qualifying components, so the matter was remanded for fresh verification of use. Credit on nickel screen and gunny bags was allowed because the record showed they were covered by the declarations filed, making the sole ground of denial unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 525 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258643</link>
      <description>For the period before 23.07.1996, steel items such as angles, channels, joists, plates and tubes used as machinery parts or as structures integrally connected with plant were treated as eligible for Modvat credit under the wider capital goods concept, so the credit denial for that period was set aside. For January 1997 to March 1997, eligibility under the amended capital goods definition depended on the actual use of the steel items in fabrication of machinery or qualifying components, so the matter was remanded for fresh verification of use. Credit on nickel screen and gunny bags was allowed because the record showed they were covered by the declarations filed, making the sole ground of denial unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>