https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258642 The Tribunal set aside the remand order and directed the first appellate authority to decide on merits, allowing the appellants to produce additional evidence if needed. The rejection of refund claims for certain services like Public Relation and Consulting Services was deemed incorrect, requiring reconsideration by the first appellate authority. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and matters were remanded for fresh consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals) in line with principles of natural justice. All appeals were allowed through remand, ensuring a fair and thorough reconsideration of the refund claims under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. en-us Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258642 The Tribunal set aside the remand order and directed the first appellate authority to decide on merits, allowing the appellants to produce additional evidence if needed. The rejection of refund claims for certain services like Public Relation and Consulting Services was deemed incorrect, requiring reconsideration by the first appellate authority. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and matters were remanded for fresh consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals) in line with principles of natural justice. All appeals were allowed through remand, ensuring a fair and thorough reconsideration of the refund claims under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258642