https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258633 The Court dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding the treatment of a transport subsidy as income under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2002-03. Despite acknowledging the non-receipt of a portion of the subsidy, the Court found that the appellant's inconsistent arguments and lack of supporting documentation undermined their case. Emphasizing the need for consistent and substantiated claims, the Court held that no substantial legal question arose, ultimately denying relief to the appellant. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258633 The Court dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding the treatment of a transport subsidy as income under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2002-03. Despite acknowledging the non-receipt of a portion of the subsidy, the Court found that the appellant's inconsistent arguments and lack of supporting documentation undermined their case. Emphasizing the need for consistent and substantiated claims, the Court held that no substantial legal question arose, ultimately denying relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258633