https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258629 The High Court upheld the Assessing Officer's findings regarding the windmill project, dismissing the appeal due to discrepancies in the commissioning date and depreciation claim. The Tribunal's interference with factual conclusions was deemed permissible, emphasizing the importance of verifiable evidence. The court rejected the appellant's arguments, citing inconsistencies in project execution and location. The absence of expert opinion was noted but deemed irrelevant, and the application of legal precedent did not alter the outcome. The dismissal was based on the lack of merit in challenging the Tribunal's decision. en-us Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258629 The High Court upheld the Assessing Officer's findings regarding the windmill project, dismissing the appeal due to discrepancies in the commissioning date and depreciation claim. The Tribunal's interference with factual conclusions was deemed permissible, emphasizing the importance of verifiable evidence. The court rejected the appellant's arguments, citing inconsistencies in project execution and location. The absence of expert opinion was noted but deemed irrelevant, and the application of legal precedent did not alter the outcome. The dismissal was based on the lack of merit in challenging the Tribunal's decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258629