<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 506 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258624</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on tax liability for compensation received on surrender of tenancy rights was dismissed. The Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) found that the tenancy rights belonged to the individual partners, not the Respondent firm, based on historical documents and agreements. As the conclusion was factual, no substantial legal question arose, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 506 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258624</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on tax liability for compensation received on surrender of tenancy rights was dismissed. The Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) found that the tenancy rights belonged to the individual partners, not the Respondent firm, based on historical documents and agreements. As the conclusion was factual, no substantial legal question arose, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>