<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 499 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258617</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance for unverified purchases to 15% and upholding disallowances of specific expenses like telephone, traveling, and conveyance. The decision was based on applying precedent cases, including the case of Shri Anuj Kumar Varshney, and considering the rejection of the books of account. The ITAT found no fault in the lower authorities&#039; estimation of expenses and upheld their decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 499 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258617</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance for unverified purchases to 15% and upholding disallowances of specific expenses like telephone, traveling, and conveyance. The decision was based on applying precedent cases, including the case of Shri Anuj Kumar Varshney, and considering the rejection of the books of account. The ITAT found no fault in the lower authorities&#039; estimation of expenses and upheld their decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>