<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 498 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the outstanding demand resulting from a Transfer Pricing adjustment on AMP expenses, finding the assessee had a prima facie case. The Authorized Representative argued against the inclusion of free samples and discounts in the AMP expenses calculation, which the Tribunal noted. An expedited appeal hearing was scheduled to prevent unnecessary delays and ensure a prompt resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 498 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the outstanding demand resulting from a Transfer Pricing adjustment on AMP expenses, finding the assessee had a prima facie case. The Authorized Representative argued against the inclusion of free samples and discounts in the AMP expenses calculation, which the Tribunal noted. An expedited appeal hearing was scheduled to prevent unnecessary delays and ensure a prompt resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>