https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169336 Unexplained delay in considering a preventive detention representation under the National Security Act, 1980, vitiated the detention because prompt disposal is required and the State must explain any facial delay by sworn affidavit; the detention order was quashed. In revision under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, the High Court could not disturb an undisturbed factual finding that the alleged tenancy arose from a trespasser after the decree or enlarge the revision by referring the tenancy issue to the Land Tribunal; the revisional interference was unsustainable and the execution objections were dismissed. en-us Wed, 27 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:47:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169336 Unexplained delay in considering a preventive detention representation under the National Security Act, 1980, vitiated the detention because prompt disposal is required and the State must explain any facial delay by sworn affidavit; the detention order was quashed. In revision under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, the High Court could not disturb an undisturbed factual finding that the alleged tenancy arose from a trespasser after the decree or enlarge the revision by referring the tenancy issue to the Land Tribunal; the revisional interference was unsustainable and the execution objections were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169336