<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 495 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258613</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the validity of the show-cause notice, classifying the services provided as incidental and auxiliary under Section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994. It directed a 10% deposit of confirmed duty within eight weeks for a waiver of the remaining amount pending appeal. The tribunal acknowledged both parties&#039; arguments but required further examination of facts for a final decision, ruling in favor of a partial waiver and staying recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 495 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258613</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the validity of the show-cause notice, classifying the services provided as incidental and auxiliary under Section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994. It directed a 10% deposit of confirmed duty within eight weeks for a waiver of the remaining amount pending appeal. The tribunal acknowledged both parties&#039; arguments but required further examination of facts for a final decision, ruling in favor of a partial waiver and staying recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>