<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 494 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258612</link>
    <description>The court held that an audit assessment under Section 42 cannot follow an assessment under Section 43 for the same period under the OVAT Act. It concluded that taxing the same turnover twice is impermissible and set aside the assessment order under Section 42 for the period in question. The court allowed the petitioner to be assessed under Section 42 excluding the period already assessed under Section 43, emphasizing statutory interpretation in line with legislative intent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 494 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258612</link>
      <description>The court held that an audit assessment under Section 42 cannot follow an assessment under Section 43 for the same period under the OVAT Act. It concluded that taxing the same turnover twice is impermissible and set aside the assessment order under Section 42 for the period in question. The court allowed the petitioner to be assessed under Section 42 excluding the period already assessed under Section 43, emphasizing statutory interpretation in line with legislative intent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>