https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258602 The appellant, a Shipping agency, appealed against a penalty reduction imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under the Customs Act. The penalty was for contravention of regulations by demanding a security deposit from a CHA/importer. The appellant cited a Tribunal judgment to contest the penalty imposition. The judge found the Facility Notice in question did not bind the Shipping Agency to transport containers to a specific CFS. Relying on the Tribunal's judgment, the judge allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty. en-us Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258602 The appellant, a Shipping agency, appealed against a penalty reduction imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under the Customs Act. The penalty was for contravention of regulations by demanding a security deposit from a CHA/importer. The appellant cited a Tribunal judgment to contest the penalty imposition. The judge found the Facility Notice in question did not bind the Shipping Agency to transport containers to a specific CFS. Relying on the Tribunal's judgment, the judge allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258602