<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Job Work done in house the Factory</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108424</link>
    <description>Whether in-house job work attracts service tax turns on substance: processes amounting to manufacture are not taxable services, while job workers who supply only labour using the principal&#039;s materials and resources may be treated as providing manpower supply, bringing the service tax liability onto the recipient under the reverse charge mechanism; contractual form (wage-sheet versus piece-rate) and excise treatment of the final product affect the tax outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:44:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Job Work done in house the Factory</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108424</link>
      <description>Whether in-house job work attracts service tax turns on substance: processes amounting to manufacture are not taxable services, while job workers who supply only labour using the principal&#039;s materials and resources may be treated as providing manpower supply, bringing the service tax liability onto the recipient under the reverse charge mechanism; contractual form (wage-sheet versus piece-rate) and excise treatment of the final product affect the tax outcome.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:44:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>