<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>No interest and/ or penalty can be levied just because the Assessee had paid Service tax, which was actually not payable</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6217</link>
    <description>Because statutory liability to pay service tax on the impugned intellectual property services arose only by a later amendment adopting the Reverse Charge Mechanism, the taxpayer was not legally liable for service tax during the disputed period and consequently could not be charged interest or penalty on amounts not legally payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:12:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:12:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=381784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>No interest and/ or penalty can be levied just because the Assessee had paid Service tax, which was actually not payable</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6217</link>
      <description>Because statutory liability to pay service tax on the impugned intellectual property services arose only by a later amendment adopting the Reverse Charge Mechanism, the taxpayer was not legally liable for service tax during the disputed period and consequently could not be charged interest or penalty on amounts not legally payable.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:12:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>